Experience. Results.
(Calls answered 24/7)

No Correlation Between Malpractice Payouts and Insurance Premiums

From American Association of Justice:

Empirical research has found that there is little correlation between malpractice payouts and malpractice premiums. A study by researchers at the University of Texas, Columbia University and the University of Illinois based on closed claims compiled by the Texas Department of Insurance concluded that “the rapid changes in insurance premiums that sparked the crisis appear to reflect insurance market dynamics, largely disconnected from claim outcomes.”i

Researchers from the National Bureau of Economic Research came to the same conclusion, stating, “increases in malpractice payments made on behalf of physicians do not seem to be the driving force behind increases in premiums.”ii The AIR analysis likewise found no relationship between insurer payouts and premiums. AIR concluded, “Not only was there no “explosion” in lawsuits, jury awards or any tort system costs to justify the astronomical premium increases that doctors have been charged in recent years. These rate increases were rather driven by the economic cycle of the insurance industry, driven by declining interest rates and investments.”iii Instead, market dynamics, such as the fluctuation of investment income according to interest rate swings, were the sole cause of increased premiums.

The conclusion of much of the empirical research is that even if tort reform saves insurance companies money, those savings are not passed on in the form of lower physician premiums or health care costs. A study of the leading medical malpractice insurance companies’ financial statements by former Missouri Insurance Commissioner Jay Angoff found that these insurers artificially raised doctors’ premiums and misled the public about the nature of medical negligence claims.iv According to the study, the amount the leading malpractice insurers projected they would pay out in claims in the future declined; the amount they actually paid out in claims declined; and their surplus-the extra cushion they have accumulated over and above the amount they have set aside to pay claims in the future-increased to an all-time high-five times the state minimum surplus for insurer stability.


Analysis of Top 15 Medical Malpractice Insurers
– “No Basis for High Insurance Rates,” Jay Angoff, May 2007

i Bernard Black, Charles Silver, David A. Hyman, and William M. Sage, Stability, Not Crisis: Medical Malpractice Claim Outcomes in Texas, 1988-2002, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2005.

ii Katherine Baicker and Amitabh Chandra, The Effect of Malpractice Liability on the Delivery of Health Care, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper, 10709, 2004.

iii Medical Malpractice Insurance: Stable Losses/Unstable Rates 2007, Americans for Insurance Reform, March 28, 2007.

iv Jay Angoff, No Basis for High Insurance Rates, May 2007,http://www.justice.org/resources/No_Basis_for_High_Insurance_Rates_2007.pdf.

DISCLAIMER: An attorney-client relationship with us cannot be formed by transmission or receipt of the information on this Website and any information you send in an e-mail message to this website will not make you a client. We reserve the right to decline any representation for any reason. This Website is for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide legal advice. You should not act or rely on any information in this Website without seeking the advice of a lawyer

Tell us about your case.
All inquiries confidential.